Your Paper, Your Path. Everything ought to be made as easy as possible, yet not easier.


Your Paper, Your Path. Everything ought to be made as easy as possible, yet not easier.

– Related To Albert Einstein

View

Prezi for more information about Your Paper, your path

A plea that is recurring scientists is actually to simplify the entire process of planning and publishing documents. With every log having various technical and formatting needs and lots of documents being submitted more often than once before book, writers believe it is onerous to own to invest precious time re-formatting in place of engaging with all the more effective areas of research. In reality, almost one in three scientists indicated “preparing manuscripts” when asked what work tasks they found many aggravating or time intensive, in a study completed by Elsevier’s analysis and Academic Relations department in 2012.

Aided by the goal of making the distribution procedure simpler, the Elsevier log, complimentary revolutionary Biology and Medicine launched Your Paper, Your Way (YPYW) in 2011. YPYW is a less strenuous distribution procedure, concentrating on the caliber of the technology when you look at the initial phases of distribution and just needing elements required for ultimate manufacturing in the modification phase. If documents are rejected, this easier distribution process saves writers commitment and in addition, can help them attain quicker book rates.

YPYW has been extended to a huge selection of Elsevier journals. Every journal which provides YPYW obviously suggests this at the start of its guide for writers, the following:

” We currently differentiate amongst the demands for brand new and submissions that are revised. You might decide to submit your manuscript being a solitary word or pdf file to be utilized within the refereeing procedure. Only once your paper has reached the modification phase, are you required to put your paper as a ‘correct structure’ for acceptance and offer those items needed for the book of the article.”

Your Paper, Your Path needs

  • Authors may submit their manuscript (text, figures and tables) being a file that is single. This is often A term or PDF file, in virtually any structure or design, and numbers and tables are put in the text.
  • Numbers must be of high sufficient quality for refereeing.
  • There are not any strict formatting demands but all manuscripts must support the essential elements necessary to evaluate a manuscript (Abstract, keyword phrases, Introduction, components & techniques, outcomes, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions).
  • Sources could be in every style or format, as long since the style is consistent. Author(s) name(s), journal title/book name, article name (where necessary), 12 months of book, amount & problem /book chapter and also the pagination must certanly be current. Utilization of DOI is highly motivated. The guide design employed by the log shall be reproduced to your accepted article by Elsevier during the evidence stage.
  • Whenever the revision is reached by a paper phase, authors may be required to produce any items which continue to be necessary for book, as an example editable source files.

Reactions to YPYW

YPYW happens to be favorably gotten by writers. In a study delivered by Elsevier’s Research and Academic Relations department to writers that has chosen YPYW whenever publishing their manuscript, associated with the 3,958 writers surveyed, 70% reacted absolutely when asked, “Did Your Paper, the right path lower the period of time it normally takes to essay writing format and submit the manuscript?” Feedback received from surveyed writers included:

. time-consuming work that is formatting not undertaken needlessly.

I did not need to spend time with formatting before being yes in regards to the acceptance.

It absolutely was simpler and faster than [the] traditional one. I believe it’s a way that is good speed the procedure.

92% of writers surveyed found YPYW effortless or acutely effortless, in comparison to 61per cent of writers whom utilized the conventional procedure.

To gauge the effect on reviewers, 870 reactions from Elsevier’s existing Reviewer Feedback Programme (RFP) were analyzed, of which 346 linked to a YPYW submission. There have been no differences that are significant reviewer satisfaction. Some reviewers have actually complimented the modification given that it makes their everyday lives more straightforward to look at the figures and tables inside the text, as opposed to by the end for the manuscript as it is typically needed.

Further reading

“Your Paper, Your Way”, Kelvin J A Davies, PhD, DSc, Editor-in-Chief, Complimentary Revolutionary Biology & Medicine

“Your Paper, your path and also the reviewing procedure”, Catriona Fennell, Rebecca Barrie


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.